Your current location:HOME >style >Calling a female colleague a 'pretty woman' at work is sex discrimination, tribunal rules 正文
TIME:2024-05-21 21:51:28 Source: Internet compilationEdit:style
Calling a female colleague a 'pretty woman' at work is sex discrimination, a tribunal has ruled.Sugg
Calling a female colleague a 'pretty woman' at work is sex discrimination, a tribunal has ruled.
Suggesting that a women's looks might help the business is not 'flattering' and risks 'diminishing' her as it wouldn't be said to a man, an employment judge found.
The ruling came in the case of an accounts manager who sued her employers after her boss told her to attend a meeting - because a male client liked 'pretty women'.
Emma Nunn said she was left feeling 'humiliated and undermined' when Adam Crouch extended the invitation purely for her physical appearance, the employment tribunal heard.
He then 'demeaned' her further by telling her to 'calm down' when she refused, before signing off his message with 'babes', it concluded.
Miss Nunn resigned from her £60,000 a year job and is now in line to receive compensation after winning her claim of sex discrimination with the judge ruled the comments were 'reducing her value to the business' and wouldn't have been made to a male colleague.
Calling a female colleague a 'pretty woman' at work is sex discrimination, a tribunal has ruled (Stock photo)
The Leicester tribunal heard Mr Crouch took over trucking firm G. & M.J. Crouch & Son, in the city, from his father in 2015, but Miss Nunn had known him as a longstanding family friend since she was 18.
She had worked part time within the vehicle recovery services business before agreeing on a permanent role on in February 2020.
Miss Nunn told the panel their particular friendship led to a 'blurring of the nature of their working relationship'.
'Mr Crouch did not speak, consult with, or treat any another female employee like he spoke and treated me,' she said.
'The 20 year friendship came with significant consequences - I tolerated his behaviour as best I could.
READ MORE: Calling a woman 'glamorous' at work risks undermining or belittling them, tribunal rules as beauty queen lawyer loses claim that her female boss racially discriminated against her by using the term'He was not speaking to me like a boss more like a husband disappointed in a wife (me).
'At one level I was a trust confidante, someone to let off steam to, to disclose inner most secrets and feelings to and next I was a normal employee.'
However, the tribunal found this dynamic of not being 'a purely professional working relationship', was actually 'encouraged' by both of them.
In April 2021, Mr Crouch - who is married - sent her a message about an upcoming meeting saying: 'oh yeah you should come as [a customer] is attending - he likes pretty women.'
When she queried this, replying 'I am not coming if just for pretty face', he told her to 'calm down' and signed off with 'ok babes xx'.
In a subsequent email to Mr Crouch complaining about her treatment, she asked: 'Is that all I get recognised for that I am attractive?'
She resigned later that month, saying she felt 'humiliated and undermined' and took the firm to the tribunal, making a series of claims of sex discrimination and harassment.
While most were dismissed, the 'pretty woman' complaint was upheld.
Employment Judge Rachel Broughton said: [We] find that the 'pretty face' comment would not have been said to a man, or an equivalent comment made about a male colleague's physical attractiveness as a reason for being invited to a work meeting.
'It should have been obvious to him that such a comment would be unwelcome.
'It was not flattering [Miss Nunn], it was reducing her value to the business in that context, and what she would contribute to the meeting.
'The Tribunal conclude that the reference to 'pretty' is sexual in nature. It is about her physical attractiveness and in this context, her physical attractiveness to the opposite sex, a customer.
'The implication is that [the customer] finds her sexually attractive and would for that reason get some pleasure at looking at her in the meeting and/or interacting with her.
'The comment was sexual in nature and was said because of her sex, that she is a woman.'
EJ Broughton concluded that by referring to her as 'babes' in his response, he had 'demeaned her further'.
'Babes' in this context was not affectionate, it was making fun of her reaction and the impact his first comment had,' she continued.
'She felt she was being diminished in terms of her importance to the business and her concerns were being dealt with flippantly, [we] conclude that in this context she was genuinely and reasonably, aggrieved at both not being invited and being told that she should come not because of her work but because the male client considered her attractive.'
The judge concluded 'pretty women' and 'babes' were used 'because of [Miss Nunn]'s sex'.
'Mr Crouch would not have dismissed her concerns in the way he did, but for her sex,' she added.
'He was flippant because of the relationship they had but he used those specific terms because of her sex.
'She was upset and felt diminished professionally by his comments and the tribunal consider that it was reasonable for her to feel that way.'
A further hearing to award compensation will take place at a later date.
California congressman urges closer consultation with tribes on offshore wind2024-05-21 21:23
Search to continue for 792024-05-21 21:18
Tear gas as crowds clash with riot police in Russia2024-05-21 20:58
China and India hold talks over Ladakh border standoff2024-05-21 20:38
These hilarious notices will make you do a double take2024-05-21 20:36
Tauranga bars to close earlier under booze rule changes2024-05-21 20:22
Government to spend more money on silt clean2024-05-21 20:07
Labour Party says use of Andrew Tate image in Instagram post a mistake2024-05-21 19:37
IF starring Ryan Reynolds lands at the top of a lackluster box office with less2024-05-21 19:17
Proposal unveiled for new facility combining Nelson's library, civic centre, community hub2024-05-21 19:09
Forensic psychiatrist reveals the different types of stalkers2024-05-21 21:11
Ai Weiwei mourns Hong Kong freedoms but is 'proud' of Tiananmen middle2024-05-21 20:58
Police chief charged over Seoul Halloween crush that killed 1592024-05-21 20:46
Cancer patients' travel funding boost: 'Important no one falling through the gap'2024-05-21 20:35
Jon Wysocki dead at 53: Staind drummer passes away2024-05-21 20:16
Search to continue for 792024-05-21 20:13
Rising costs, working from home blamed for hospitality struggles2024-05-21 20:07
Death penalty for artist behind Kyoto anime fire, which killed 362024-05-21 20:05
David Cronenberg's new grief2024-05-21 19:53
KiwiRail seeks advice to extend life of Interislander Kaitaki ferry2024-05-21 19:08